Elevating Safety: Essential Work at Height Guidance for Residential Surveyors

Navigating Real-World Risks and Legal Duties During Property Inspections

Introduction: Why Height Safety Matters in Residential Surveying

Residential property surveying inherently involves tasks that necessitate working at height, ranging from comprehensive roof inspections to assessing high-level defects on building facades or within multi-storey properties. Falls from height carry profound dangers, frequently leading to severe injuries or, tragically, fatalities.

These aren't just abstract risks; they're real-world incidents that can profoundly impact our members. One RPSA surveyor, for instance, lost the tip of a finger after a faulty aluminium loft ladder collapsed. Another needed dental surgery after being struck by a rapidly descending pull-down ladder. These aren't freak occurrences—they're the hidden dangers of our everyday environment, often encountered while working alone.

Andrew McColl, RPSA Chairman, adds: “I’ve personally had a loft ladder collapse under me because it hadn’t been correctly secured. It’s not just about risk – it’s about the fact that these dangers are always there. And we’re often operating in older buildings where low balcony rails, openable full-height sash windows and absent handrails simply wouldn’t pass modern building regs. They still have to be inspected, and we’re the ones doing it.”

Consequently, implementing robust safety measures transcends mere regulatory compliance; it represents a fundamental professional obligation and a cornerstone of personal well-being.

The Residential Property Surveyors Association (RPSA) is deeply committed to cultivating a strong safety culture among its members. This commitment ensures that professional excellence is inextricably linked with stringent health and safety practices. This report aims to distil complex Health and Safety Executive (HSE) guidance into actionable directives specifically tailored for residential surveyors. A proactive approach to safety, where a surveyor visibly prioritises and implements superior height safety protocols—such as investing in advanced equipment, undergoing rigorous training, and conducting comprehensive risk assessments—can significantly enhance professional standing. Thinking ahead not only reduces risk—it sets a tone for professionalism and earns trust with clients. This perspective transforms safety from a perceived cost centre into a demonstrable value proposition for the surveying profession.

Quick Summary:

• Falls from height are the most common cause of workplace fatalities in the UK.
• Surveyors face height risks every day, from loft access to fragile roofs.
• This guidance distils HSE legislation into practical advice for residential inspections.
• Real-world examples highlight why dynamic risk assessment is essential.
• RPSA members are encouraged to prioritise safety as a professional benchmark.

Understanding the Legal Landscape: Work at Height Regulations 2005.

The Work at Height Regulations 2005 form the bedrock of safety for any activity involving elevated work. As an employer or self-employed contractor, there is a clear legal mandate to assess the risks associated with work at height and to meticulously organise and plan such work to ensure its safe execution. The overarching duty is to safeguard employees and any other individuals who might be affected by the work from harm.

Crucially, the definition of "work at height" extends beyond merely being elevated above ground level. It encompasses "work in any place where, if precautions were not taken, a person could fall a distance liable to cause personal injury." This broad definition covers potential falls into areas below ground, such as trenches, or falls through fragile surfaces, including skylights or aged roof sheeting. This expanded scope is particularly pertinent for residential surveyors, who frequently encounter properties with fragile roof structures, unboarded loft spaces, or other less obvious fall hazards. The legal framework is designed to cover any scenario where a fall could cause injury, compelling professionals to adopt a holistic and preventative mindset rather than merely reacting to perceived "high" locations. This proactive stance minimises unforeseen liabilities and elevates the overall safety culture within the profession.

A fundamental aspect of this legal framework is the mandatory requirement for risk assessments. For businesses employing five or more individuals, these assessment findings are legally required to be documented in writing. Even for smaller operations, documenting these assessments is highly recommended as best practice. Non-compliance with these regulations can lead to severe repercussions, including enforcement notices, prosecution, substantial fines, and, in serious cases, imprisonment.

The Foundation of Safety: Mastering Risk Assessment

A risk assessment is a systematic and critical process designed to identify potential hazards, evaluate the risks they pose, and subsequently implement effective control measures. It is, in essence, "a careful examination of what could cause harm" in the workplace. The HSE advocates a structured 5-step process, which can be effectively tailored for residential surveyors:

• Identify the Hazards: This initial step involves a thorough inspection of the property and its surroundings. Surveyors should actively look for anything that could cause harm, observing the environment, consulting any available manuals (e.g., for specific roof types), and considering lessons learned from past near-misses. Specific hazards relevant to residential surveying include:

• Unstable or fragile roof surfaces, such as asbestos cement, old skylights, or rotten timber.
• Unsecured or improperly positioned ladders and stepladders.
• Open voids, including unboarded loft joists, open manholes, or trenches.
• Unsafe access points like narrow ledges or broken steps.
• Adverse weather conditions (e.g., strong winds, rain, ice) could compromise stability.
• The risk of falling objects from height, such as loose tiles or debris from chimneys.
• Proximity to external factors like overhead power lines or other utilities.
• The presence of unsecured or faulty access equipment.

• Determine Who Might Be Harmed and How: This step requires considering all individuals who could be affected by the work at height. This includes the surveyor themselves, clients or property owners present during the inspection, other contractors on site, and members of the public (e.g., passing pedestrians near scaffolding). Special consideration must be given to vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, or individuals with disabilities. Potential harm extends not only to people but also to damage to property or equipment.

• Evaluate the Risks and Decide on Precautions: Here, the likelihood of each identified hazard causing harm and the potential severity of that harm are assessed. Risks should be prioritised (e.g., low, medium, or high). Subsequently, the Hierarchy of Control (Avoid, Prevent, Minimise) must be applied to determine appropriate precautions. This involves evaluating the effectiveness of any existing controls and identifying where additional measures are necessary.

• Record Your Findings and Implement Them: All identified hazards, assessed risks, and planned control measures must be documented. This documentation is mandatory for businesses with five or more employees and serves as crucial evidence of due diligence. It is essential to ensure that all planned safety measures are effectively implemented.

• Review Your Assessment and Update if Necessary: Risk assessments are not a static, one-time exercise. They require regular review, ideally at least once a year. Furthermore, assessments must be updated following significant changes (e.g., new equipment, altered procedures), after any accidents or near-misses, or when new hazards are identified.

A critical aspect of effective risk management is recognising the interconnectedness of various risk factors and the need for dynamic assessment. The effectiveness of control measures is not constant; it is profoundly influenced by factors such as the individual's competence, prevailing environmental conditions, and the specific nature of the task. For example, a ladder might be deemed safe for a brief, low-level check on a dry day by a highly competent surveyor. However, that same ladder becomes inherently unsafe for a prolonged task on a windy, wet day, especially if used by someone with less experience. This highlights the need for a dynamic, on-the-spot risk check, even when a full pre-assessment has been done. This approach transforms safety from a paperwork exercise into a live process—a constant practice of vigilance and adaptation. It demands real-time, informed decisions and clear professional judgment.

Common pitfalls in risk assessment include being overly general rather than specific to the workplace, overlooking less obvious hazards, failing to involve workers in the process, not reviewing assessments regularly, implementing excessive controls for minor risks, and poor communication of findings.

Risk Assessment Checklist for Residential Surveyors

If you’ve had a narrow escape, developed a clever workaround, or invested in access equipment you’d recommend, we want to hear from you. Your experience could help a fellow surveyor avoid injury.

The Hierarchy of Control: Your Safety Blueprint

The HSE champions a clear, three-stage 'hierarchy of control' for managing work at height risks: Avoid, Prevent, and Minimise. This hierarchy is foundational, unequivocally prioritising collective protection measures over personal protection.

1. Avoid Working at Height if Possible. This represents the most effective control measure. If a task can be accomplished safely from the ground or by assembling components at ground level before installation, the risk of falling is entirely eliminated. For residential surveyors, this principle translates into several practical applications:

• Drone Technology: Utilising drones for roof inspections, particularly on complex, exceptionally high, or fragile roof structures, eliminates the need for physical access by the surveyor. This eliminates the fall risk entirely.
• Extendable Tools: Utilising extendable cameras, poles, or binoculars from ground level enables detailed inspection of gutters, fascias, or high-level brickwork without the need for ascending.
• Ground-Level Assessment: If a minor adjustment or preliminary assessment of an external fixture (e.g., a satellite dish) can be performed by lowering it to ground level, this avoids unnecessary work at height.

•  Prevent a Fall. When working at height cannot be avoided, the next imperative is to implement measures that prevent a fall from occurring. This stage emphasises collective protection, which safeguards everyone in the vicinity, before resorting to personal protective equipment.

Collective Protection (Protects multiple individuals)

• Existing Safe Workplaces: Utilising areas already equipped with permanent perimeter guardrails, such as a concrete flat roof with established edge protection, provides an inherently safe working environment.
• Mobile Elevating Work Platforms (MEWPs): Equipment like scissor lifts or boom lifts offers a stable, guarded platform for external inspections of multi-storey buildings, ensuring a secure and controlled working space.
• Tower Scaffolds/Scaffolds: For more extensive external surveys or in situations where MEWPs are impractical, a properly erected       and regularly inspected scaffold provides a robust, collective working platform.
• Safety Decking Systems: For internal work where floor joists are exposed (e.g., during loft conversions), safety decking can be installed to prevent falls through voids.

Personal Protection (Protects only the individual user)

• Work Restraint Systems: These systems physically prevent a worker from reaching a position where a fall could occur. This might be suitable on a flat roof where a perimeter edge is present but not fully enclosed, limiting movement to a safe zone.

•  Minimise the Distance and/or Consequences of a Fall If, despite all avoidance and prevention measures, the risk of a fall persists, steps must be taken to minimise the distance and impact of such a fall. This is considered the last resort in the hierarchy.

Collective Protection:

• Safety Nets/Soft Landing Systems: Airbags or safety nets installed near the work level are designed to cushion a fall, significantly reducing the severity of injuries.

Personal Protection:

• Fall Arrest Systems: This equipment, comprising a harness, lanyard, and an anchor point, is designed to safely stop a fall once it has occurred. It necessitates a high anchor point and meticulous planning to ensure sufficient fall clearance below the work area.
• Industrial Rope Access: While less common for general residential surveying, this method is used for highly specialised tasks on building facades.

The hierarchy's explicit prioritisation of collective protection over personal protection carries significant implications. While collective measures like scaffolding might initially appear to incur a higher upfront cost for a single inspection, their long-term advantages are substantial. These include reduced liability, as they protect everyone on site, not just the trained user, thereby lowering the overall risk profile for both the surveyor and the client. Furthermore, a stable platform allows for more thorough and comfortable inspections, potentially leading to higher quality reports and fewer missed defects compared to precarious ladder work or rope access. Demonstrating a commitment to the highest safety standards through collective protection also builds trust with clients and differentiates the surveyor in the market. While MEWPs and scaffolds require competent users, the inherent safety margin is greater than personal systems, which demand meticulous individual training, fit-testing, and anchor point assessment for every single use. This indicates that the hierarchy is not merely a safety rule but also an economic and operational strategy. Prioritising collective protection, though sometimes seemingly more expensive initially, often results in greater overall safety, efficiency, and reduced long-term costs associated with accidents, insurance premiums, and reputational damage.

Hierarchy of Control: Practical Applications for Surveyors

“It’s the old buildings that catch you out. Nothing’s fixed, rails are too low, and no one’s thought about safe access in 150 years.” — Surveyor (anonymous), RPSA Member Feedback.

Equipment Matters: Selecting and Using Safely

The selection and correct use of access equipment are pivotal to working safely at height. Each piece of equipment has specific applications and limitations that surveyors must be aware of.

Ladders & Stepladders

For tasks that are of low risk and short duration, ladders and stepladders can be a sensible and practical option. However, their use must be rigorously assessed. If a risk assessment determines that a ladder is appropriate, surveyors must ensure:

• Right Type for the Job: The chosen ladder is suitable for the specific task and environment.
• Competence: Workers using ladders are suitably trained and/or supervised.
• Safe System of Work: The equipment is used safely, adhering to a predefined safe system of work.
• Awareness: Workers are fully aware of the risks involved and the measures in place to mitigate them.
• Ground and Weather Conditions: Always consider the stability of the ground and prevailing weather conditions, as these can significantly impact ladder safety.

Scaffolding

Scaffolding provides a stable and secure working platform, often preferred for more extensive or prolonged work at height. Its use is governed by strict regulations:

• Competent Design and Erection: Scaffolds must be designed,      erected, altered, and dismantled exclusively by competent individuals,      working under the direction of a competent supervisor. This work should align with recognised safety guidance, such as the National Access and Scaffolding Confederation (NASC) Safety Guidance SG4. Complex or non-standard scaffold structures often require bespoke design by a competent person, as proven by calculation. Informing the scaffold provider if heavy loads are anticipated on platforms is crucial, as this may necessitate a bespoke design.

Legal Inspection Requirements: It is the responsibility of the scaffold user to ensure that all scaffolding is inspected.

• Following installation and before its first use.
• At intervals of no more than 7 days thereafter.
• Following any circumstances liable to jeopardise the structure's safety, such as adverse weather (e.g., high winds) or alterations.

These inspections must be carried out by a competent person with appropriate knowledge, training, and experience for the scaffold's type and complexity. Inspection reports detailing any defects or risks must be prepared promptly and shared with the client/employer.

• Handover Certificates and Tagging: Although scaffolding handover certificates are not a legal requirement, they represent best practice. They confirm the scaffold is fit for purpose, highlight any limitations (e.g., maximum loading), and can serve as the initial inspection. Similarly, tagging a scaffold as safe to use is best practice, though not legally mandated. However, if a scaffold is incomplete or unsafe, it must be tagged as unsafe in accordance with the Health and Safety Regulations 1996, and physical access must be prevented.
• Key Checks for Scaffold Users: Before using any scaffold, surveyors should verify:
  • Firm, Level Foundation: The scaffold must be based on ground capable of supporting its weight and anticipated loads, with extra       support provided if needed to account for voids or soft ground.
  • Bracing and Ties: The scaffold must be adequately braced and tied into a permanent structure or otherwise stabilised. Ties must be used within their safe working load limits and installed or removed in stages to maintain stability.
  • Fully Boarded Platforms: Working platforms must be fully boarded and wide enough for the work and provide safe access (typically at least 600 mm wide). Boards must be properly supported and not overhang excessively.
  • Safe Access: There must be safe access onto the work platforms, preferably via a staircase or ladder tower.
  • Guard Rails and Toe Boards: These barriers are essential to prevent falls of people or materials. They must be strong, rigid,       fixed to a capable structure, and include a top guard rail (at least 950       mm high) and a toe board.
  • Sheeting/Netting: Never attach sheeting or debris netting to a scaffold without informing the designers/erectors, as the scaffold needs to be designed to accommodate the additional wind loading.
  • Segregation: Scaffolds should not be erected or dismantled over people or busy pavements. Segregated areas and less busy times should be used if there is a public danger.

Other Access Equipment

While ladders and scaffolds are common, other equipment like MEWPs offer distinct advantages, particularly for preventing falls through collective protection. Their safe use also hinges on proper training, adherence to manufacturer instructions, and consideration of ground and weather conditions. Low-level access equipment can also provide safer alternatives to ladders for tasks requiring increased productivity in narrow spaces.

Competence and Supervision: The Human Element of Safety

The effectiveness of any safety measure ultimately rests on the competence of the individuals involved. The regulations explicitly state that no one should be involved in any aspect of working at height unless they are fully trained and competent to do so. This encompasses planning, organisation, supervision, and the actual use of equipment.

Competence is defined as a combination of skills, knowledge, and behaviour. For surveyors, this means:

• Self-awareness: Understanding one's own capabilities, limitations, and personal role in the safety process.
• Situational Awareness: The ability to anticipate and respond to the unexpected, especially when working in unfamiliar surroundings. This is particularly relevant for surveyors who visit diverse properties daily.
• Risk Awareness: A broad understanding of potential risks and the measures to control them.

Surveyors often operate solo, juggling cameras, notepads, torches, and the physical act of accessing the site itself. A moment’s lapse in attention can have serious consequences—this is why slowing down and staying vigilant is a professional strength, not a weakness.

Employers must provide appropriate levels of supervision, proportional to the complexity of the work and the training and competence of the operatives. For scaffold work, for instance, a competent scaffolder (such as a CISRS-qualified scaffolder for tube and fittings, or someone trained to PASMA standards for mobile towers) is required for inspection and supervision. Trainee scaffolders must always work under direct supervision.

Beyond individual competence, there is a crucial element of collective responsibility. Workplace safety is a shared duty among all individuals. This means actively looking out for colleagues ("mates") and reporting any observed dangers or "accidents waiting to happen" to a supervisor immediately. This proactive vigilance and willingness to intervene are critical for fostering a truly safe working environment.

Real-World Scenarios & Best Practices for Surveyors

Applying the principles of the Hierarchy of Control and competence in real-world residential surveying scenarios is key to ensuring safety:

• Roof Inspections (General): Before even considering access, explore remote options. Can a drone provide sufficient detail for the initial assessment? If physical access is unavoidable, assess the roof. For flat roofs with existing parapets or guardrails, ensure they meet safety standards. For pitched roofs, scaffolding is the preferred collective protection, offering a stable platform for detailed inspection of tiles, chimneys, and valleys. If scaffolding is not reasonably practicable for a very short, low-risk task (e.g., quick check of a single chimney stack), a properly secured ladder used by a competent surveyor for a brief duration might be considered, with a second person footing the ladder and maintaining communication.
• Inspecting Fragile Roofs (e.g., old conservatories, outbuildings with asbestos cement): These surfaces are explicitly covered by work at height regulations. Never walk directly on them. The "avoid" principle is paramount in this case. Use drones, extendable cameras, or inspect from below. If access is absolutely necessary (e.g., for structural assessment), a crawling board or safety netting system must be used, ensuring that weight is distributed over the structural elements, or a scaffold must be erected over the fragile area.
• Loft Space Access: Before entering, identify if the loft is fully boarded. If not, treat unboarded joists as a fall hazard ("work at height" below ground level). Use crawling boards or safety decking to create a safe walkway. Ensure adequate lighting and ventilation.
• Multi-storey Facade Inspections: For properties beyond ladder height, MEWPs offer excellent collective protection, allowing for safe,      stable inspection of windows, brickwork, and render. For extensive defects or multiple access points, full scaffolding is the most robust solution.
• Chimney Stack Inspections: Often requiring work at height, these are high-risk areas. Scaffolding is ideal. If a ladder is used for a brief, low-risk check, ensure it's correctly positioned, secured, and the surveyor is competent and aware of risks. Always consider falling objects from the chimney itself.
• Public Safety: When any access equipment (especially scaffolding) encroaches on public pathways, ensure necessary licences are obtained from the local Highway Authority. Always segregate the work area and consider performing work during off-peak hours to minimise public exposure. Ensure guardrails and toeboards are in place to prevent materials from falling onto passersby.

Conclusion: Prioritising Safety for Professional Excellence

Working at height is an unavoidable aspect of residential surveying, but it must never be undertaken without meticulous planning and adherence to stringent safety protocols. The legal obligations under the Work at Height Regulations 2005 are clear, mandating comprehensive risk assessments and the implementation of effective control measures.

The Hierarchy of Control—Avoid, Prevent, Minimise—serves as the definitive blueprint for managing fall risks, consistently prioritising collective protection over individual reliance on personal protective equipment. This approach not only enhances safety but also contributes to operational efficiency and professional reputation.

The careful selection, correct use, and regular inspection of access equipment are non-negotiable. Equally vital is the human element: ensuring that all surveyors are thoroughly competent, possessing the necessary skills, knowledge, and behavioural awareness, and operating under appropriate supervision. A culture of collective responsibility, where every individual actively contributes to identifying and mitigating hazards, is paramount.

For residential surveyors, prioritising safety is not merely about compliance; it is a fundamental pillar of professional excellence. By consistently applying these guidelines, RPSA members can safeguard their well-being, protect their clients, and uphold the highest standards of the surveying profession. Continuous learning and a proactive commitment to safety are the hallmarks of a responsible and distinguished surveyor.

We're always learning and improving, and your experiences are invaluable.

📢 RPSA Wants Your Input. Got a close call, best practice tip, or favourite access kit? Help others stay safe by sharing your experience. Email us at [andrew@rpsa.org.uk] or contribute to our upcoming ‘Lessons from the Ladder’ case study pack.

Audio overview (slightly cheesy, but useful) Click Here