Confessions of a cyber conveyancer: ‘It’s 100% or nothing – the great AI debate’
Summary
The article argues that views on AI in conveyancing are becoming polarised, with some professionals expecting perfection and dismissing the technology when it falls short. It stresses that AI can support legal work, but responsibility, review and judgement must remain with the lawyer, particularly where client communications are concerned.
Why it matters
Residential property surveyors increasingly work alongside conveyancers and other property professionals using AI-enabled tools, so the discussion is relevant to workflow, risk management and client communication. It also highlights the need for human oversight when technology is used in property transactions and related reporting.
Key points
- AI in conveyancing is being judged by some users as either fully reliable or not worth using at all.
- The article says liability for errors remains with the lawyer, not the technology provider.
- Human review and supervision are presented as essential before client-facing output is sent.
- The author argues AI can still be useful even if it is not perfect.
- Client use of AI may increase pressure on property professionals to adopt supportive technology.
This is an RPSA summary of a publicly available article. The full content remains with the original publisher.
