Laing O’Rourke accused of leaving towers ‘unfit for human habitation’
Summary
A build-to-rent developer group is suing Laing O’Rourke over alleged defects in work on a high-rise residential development, claiming the towers were left not fit for human habitation. The article indicates the dispute concerns multiple alleged defects, but provides limited detail on the specific issues or legal basis beyond the headline claim.
Why it matters
This is relevant to residential property surveyors because it highlights the potential severity of defects in high-rise residential schemes and the associated habitability and liability risks. It also underscores the importance of identifying and documenting defects that may affect safety, occupation and remedial scope.
Key points
- Laing O’Rourke is facing legal action from a client over alleged defects.
- The claim relates to a high-rise residential development.
- The development is alleged to be 'not fit for human habitation'.
- The claimant group comprises six companies owned by build-to-rent developer Get Living.
This is an RPSA summary of a publicly available article. The full content remains with the original publisher.
