Sir Robert McAlpine in high-rise fire safety defects claim
Summary
Sir Robert McAlpine is facing a High Court damages claim over alleged fire safety defects at a London mixed-use development, with the freeholder alleging the 13 residential units were not fit for habitation. The claim references EWS1-related review work, remediation already completed, and alleged breaches of contract, warranty rights and the Defective Premises Act 1972.
Why it matters
The case highlights continuing litigation risk around historic residential developments with fire safety defects, particularly where buildings sit near or above higher-risk thresholds. Surveyors may encounter similar issues in due diligence, valuation, remediation oversight and defect reporting.
Key points
- High Court claim alleges fire safety defects at 12 to 15 Babmaes Street, London
- Property included 13 residential units and was above the 18-metre higher-risk building threshold
- Lutier says surveys identified extensive defects and units were not fit for habitation
- Claim seeks damages for remediation, professional fees, loss of rent, legal costs and interest
- References include EWS1 assessment, building contract warranties and the Defective Premises Act 1972
This is an RPSA summary of a publicly available article. The full content remains with the original publisher.
